RE Standard 350 vs Electra vs Classic 350 comparison review
Royal Enfield Bullet Standard 350 vs Bullet Electra vs Bullet
Classic 350
Also read: Suzuki Gixxer 250 vs Honda CBR250R Comparison Review
If you look at these bikes you will find significant aesthetic differences between all the three, on the Standard 350 fuel tank, you will find Royal Enfield emblem like an ornament with gold finishing. Whereas on the Bullet Electra the tank emblem is plastic chrome mascots but on the Bullet Classic 350 simple stickers have been used. The rear mudguard of the Standard 350 has square shape inner lining which looks completely different than the other bikes. Bullet Electra both front and rear mudguards are completely in chrome finishes which looks pretty classy and old school. Even the shape of Bullet Electra mudguard is quite sharp as compared to the dull mudguards out Classic 350 and the Standard 350’s. One major difference is the fork covers, the Bullet Electra 350 does not have any cover whereas the other two bikes have metal cover tubing's which sometimes keep on rubbing with the fork and make irritating noise while driving on undulations.
Check direct video Comparison review
Talking about the engine of all the bikes, all the bikes share the same engine and frame as well, if you look closely you will see that the Classic 350 has 19 inch front and 18 inch rear wheel as compared to both 19 inch front and rear of the Electra and Standard 350 models. Another difference in the Classic 350, tires are broader as compared to that of Electra and Standard which give the Classic 350 a bulkier look.
Also read: BMW G310R vs Duke 390 Comparison
Well talking about the only Royal bikes in India, Royal Enfield
has three offerings from the company. The Bullet Standard 350, Bullet Electra
and the Bullet Classic 350 which have been ruling the Indian roads since
decades.
Also read: Suzuki Gixxer 250 vs Honda CBR250R Comparison Review
If you look at these bikes you will find significant aesthetic differences between all the three, on the Standard 350 fuel tank, you will find Royal Enfield emblem like an ornament with gold finishing. Whereas on the Bullet Electra the tank emblem is plastic chrome mascots but on the Bullet Classic 350 simple stickers have been used. The rear mudguard of the Standard 350 has square shape inner lining which looks completely different than the other bikes. Bullet Electra both front and rear mudguards are completely in chrome finishes which looks pretty classy and old school. Even the shape of Bullet Electra mudguard is quite sharp as compared to the dull mudguards out Classic 350 and the Standard 350’s. One major difference is the fork covers, the Bullet Electra 350 does not have any cover whereas the other two bikes have metal cover tubing's which sometimes keep on rubbing with the fork and make irritating noise while driving on undulations.
Check direct video Comparison review
Talking about the engine of all the bikes, all the bikes share the same engine and frame as well, if you look closely you will see that the Classic 350 has 19 inch front and 18 inch rear wheel as compared to both 19 inch front and rear of the Electra and Standard 350 models. Another difference in the Classic 350, tires are broader as compared to that of Electra and Standard which give the Classic 350 a bulkier look.
Also read: BMW G310R vs Duke 390 Comparison
If you
compare the battery and headlamp luminance the Classic 350 has it all better as
it is equipped with a 14Ah battery compared to that of 8Ah and 5 Ah of Electra
and Standard 350 respectively. The Classic also has a 60/55W headlamp compared
to 35/35W of other two bikes. The Standard 350 does not require high power
batteries because the bike is not equipped with an electric starter, it only
has conventional kick start available. Electra and the Classic 350 are heavier
by 7 kg than the Standard 350 model.
Another most
liked feature on the Classic 350 is that the rear seat of the bike can be
easily removed for showing-off, whereas the other two bikes have single piece
seat for both rider and pillion.
Another key difference between the three is that the Standard 350 has a drum
brake at the front, front disc is not even an option given by RE to the
customers. Other two bikes are equipped with 280 mm dual piston brakes. Visually
the Classic 350 rider seat looks very arresting with its old school shape and
springs below the seat to provide extra smooth ride, but that's not the case in
reality. Electra and Standard 350 seats are more comfortable and very well
bolstered for long journeys.
But talking about the RE quality issues, the electrical wiring
of all the three bikes keep on getting short-circuit issue with even newly
purchased motorcycle, right from ignition switch, Amp meter and fuses keep on
blowing. Another common issue with the bike which one can face is the
spokes loosening and vehicle wobbling felt. Also the rear brake liners on any
of the three bikes don't last for more than 12k km which is very less life.
Useful tips: Always use a chain cleaner and lubricating agent with a brush, refer below link for the products
Our Choice: Electra 350
Standard 350 |
Electra 350 |
Classic 350 |
Latest BikeComparos:
Bullet Standard 350
|
Electra 350
|
Classic 350
| |
Type
|
Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark
|
Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark
|
Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark
|
Displacement
|
346cc
|
346cc
|
346cc
|
Bore x stroke
|
70mm x 90mm
|
70mm x 90mm
|
70mm x 90mm
|
Compression Ratio
|
8.5 : 1
|
8.5 : 1
|
8.5 : 1
|
Maximum Power
|
19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
|
19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
|
19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
|
Maximum Torque
|
28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
|
28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
|
28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
|
Ignition System
|
Transistorised Coil Ignition
|
Transistorised Coil Ignition
|
Transistorised Coil Ignition
|
Clutch
|
Wet ,multi-plate
|
Wet, multi-plate
|
Wet, multi-plate
|
Gearbox
|
5 Speed Constant Mesh
|
5 Speed Constant Mesh
|
5 Speed Constant Mesh
|
Lubrication
|
Wet sump
|
Wet sump
|
Wet sump
|
Engine Oil
|
15 W 50 API, SL Grade JASO MA
|
15 W 50 API, SL Grade JASO MA
|
15 W 50 API, SL Grade JASO MA
|
Fuel Supply
|
UCAL 29mm, Constant Vacuum Carburettor
|
UCAL 29mm, Constant Vacuum Carburettor
|
UCAL 29mm, Constant Vacuum Carburettor
|
Air Cleaner
|
Paper Element
|
Paper Element
|
Paper Element
|
Engine Start
|
Kick
|
Electric/Kick
|
Electric/Kick
|
CHASSIS & SUSPENSION
| |||
Type
|
Single downtube, using engine as stressed member
|
Single downtube, using engine as stressed member
|
Single downtube, using engine as stressed member
|
Front suspension
|
Telescopic, 35mm forks, 130mm travel
|
Telescopic, 35mm forks, 130mm travel
|
Telescopic, 35mm forks, 130mm travel
|
Rear suspension
|
Twin shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
|
Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
|
Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
|
DIMENSIONS
| |||
Wheelbase
|
1370 mm
|
1370 mm
|
1370 mm
|
Ground Clearance
|
135 mm
|
135 mm
|
135 mm
|
Length
|
2140 mm
|
2140 mym
|
2180 mm
|
Width
|
800 mm
|
810 mm
|
790 mm
|
Height
|
1030 mm
|
1120 mm
|
1080 mm
|
Kerb Weight
|
180 Kg (with 90% Fuel and Oil)
|
187 Kg (with 90% Fuel and Oil)
|
187 Kg (with 90% Fuel & Oil)
|
Fuel Capacity
|
13.5 Ltr
|
13.5 Ltr
|
13.5 Ltr
|
BRAKES & TYRES
| |||
Tyres Fr.
|
3.25 x 19
|
3.25 x 19
|
90/90 - 19
|
Tyres Rr.
|
3.25 x 19
|
3.25 x 19
|
110/90 - 18
|
Brakes Front
|
7" Twin lead internal expanding drum brake
|
280mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper
|
280mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper
|
Brakes Rear
|
153mm Drum, Single Lead Internal Expanding
|
153mm Drum, Single Lead Internal Expanding
|
153mm Drum, Single Lead Internal Expanding
|
ELECTRICALS
| |||
Tail Lamp
|
21 W / 5 W
|
21 W / 5 W
|
21 W / 5 W
|
Turn Signal Lamp
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Electrical System
|
12 volt - DC
|
12 volt - DC
|
12 volt - DC
|
Battery
|
12 volt, 5 Ah
|
12 volt, 8 Ah
|
12 volt, 14 Ah
|
Head Lamp
|
35 W / 35 W, HALOGEN
|
35 W / 35 W, HALOGEN
|
60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN
|
Related BikeComparos: